This is a story about docksider shoes.
But first, back up. In New York I dated a Brooklyn painter who behaved toward me in such an infuriatingly disrespectful manner that, when our summer fling ended two (three?) summers ago, I didn’t think of him at all fondly when I thought of him at all. Then, naturally, in the days before I left the city for L.A., we had one slightly scandalous eleventh-hour night in Williamsburg—actually, for me it was a kiss goodbye to the chapter in my life in which I made out with boys with paint under their fingernails in their million-story walkup studios with broken windows—and the result was that I left my favorite Neiman Marcus leather gloves with the cashmere lining at the bar where we’d been. It was his borough, so he picked them up for me, said he would drop them by my box-filled Manhattan apartment, never did. I moved to L.A. and he never mailed them like he said he would. (“Don’t you know I have pieces in the Armory Show? I’m really very busy.”) Instead, he pawned them off on a friend who’d recently moved to Hollywood and could give them to me.
So the friend loses one glove somewhere along the way, and calls me to introduce himself and say he’s a moron for being so careless, and he’d like to take me shopping for new gloves. The whole thing seemed positive at first. How gentlemanly and how gracious of him to want to return the gloves to me, when his friend certainly hadn’t been in any hurry to be dutiful about that. But then: Was this shopping trip going to be a date? Sure sounded like it. If so, first of all, I had a boyfriend. (That situation would change quickly, as it turned out—but that’s unrelated.) Second of all, was this guy pimping me to his friend in L.A.? Like writing my number on a bathroom wall?
Anyway, what the hell, right? Fast forward through a lot of miscellaneous details, and I find myself briefly dating this painter’s friend—in spite of the thing I figured was a for-sure deal-breaker when I first saw him: docksiders. Now, I appreciate that he’s from Brookline, Massachusetts, and that he went to some kind of fancy boarding school. But there is no excuse for docksiders. Particularly not when paired with—wait for it—brown socks and shorts.
I realize that since I’ve already criticized one potential suitor for his pleated-front pants, some readers might think I really don’t want happiness at all—but that instead I want well dressed. Not true. I just think things like docksiders and pleated-front pants can be indicators of a lack of self-awareness, social stiffness, and other things more grave.
And there was indeed something else even more inexcusable and inexplicable. This turned out to be the most flatulent man I’ve ever met—possibly the most flatulent man in America. I forgive a lot; I really do. I am past the point of rejecting every man for some small, insignificant thing he does that I can’t stand. My mind and my heart are open these days. But, come on. At first it happened in the middle of the night—the first night we spent together—when he’d gone to the bathroom to do his business. Completely excusable: It was his own house, and it’s a perfectly natural bodily function, and he was polite enough to do it behind the bathroom door. So then he comes back into bed and keeps doing it. Hrm. But I can still excuse that—right?—on the grounds that maybe he thinks I’m asleep (although it’s hard to imagine that anyone could sleep through all that). So then I have a small dinner party, and he spares my guests, but when they leave he reserves his flatulence privately for me. Repeat that same scenario at a dinner at his house later that week: He’d never do in front of his friends what he’d do alone with me—a woman he was presumably courting—and with no request to be excused, and no explanation, except, “I was just born this way! Haha!” After two weeks of enduring this with patience, I said, “Huh. It’s interesting that you do that in front of me, given that we just met.” He said, “We met two weeks ago.” Scandalous, really. I like a man who treats a lady like a lady. At least for the first month.
I’m sure there are some lessons to be learned here. One of them must have to do with attraction versus repulsion. Here was a man I really wanted to really want to be with. Gloriously interesting job, a terrific adventurer, well traveled and well read, smart, a good blend of silly and serious, borderline O.C.D. (this for me is a plus), interesting family history. So I tried to overlook the fact that the docksiders/brown socks/shorts combo really repulsed me. (By the way, I think he thought his family’s wealth and its legacy, and his interesting job made him an uncontestable gem in the eyes of all women, but I could be wrong about his vanity.) I was getting good at overlooking other icky bits too. But then you introduce the flatulence, and there’s only so much a girl can bear to force her feelings. When you reject someone based on lame (albeit gag-worthy) stuff like docksiders, you may be sabotaging yourself, rather than protecting yourself from a life with someone who does that thing you didn’t like—because you’d get over it since it didn’t matter anyway. But if you’d rather turn the other way than kiss the man in bed with you—no matter how many millions his art family gave to the Met—you’ve got to cut your losses. The Forcing-It Balance is a slippery slope, like the Wear-Down Theory (which I’ve seen from both sides, and I’m still trying to figure out if it can lead to a sustainable relationship—but that’s another matter).
[Full disclosure: He would later send the "let's-not-do-this-anymore" email, not me.]
The other thing about Docksiders is that he reminded me—from the very beginning—of a man (a boy, really) with whom my sister once tried to set me up, and with whom I went on one date to see the Hold Steady at the Bowery Ballroom, and whom I really, really wanted to like, but couldn’t. This was mostly on account of his tendency to send me text messages like, “Dancing with self in room to Madonna!” I mean, it’s cute…but we just met. So be a man.
8 comments:
Ooh! I got nervous at the end because if the young dude I set you up with back in the day ever reads this he might think you're implying he's flatulent, not just the Madonna thing.
I am halfway between understanding this whole phenomenon perfectly and thinking you should still strive to adjust your own attitude (easier said than done, I know). Meaning, some of it you are justified in thinking, and the other half you are still justified in thinking but it ain't gonna do anybody any good so you might as well figure out how to let it go.
The only REAL moral of the story is that IT ONLY TAKES ONE! Just ONE man who has mostly good things and doesn't wear docksiders. One man who maybe has some flaws but you tip over the balance point and he is ok with yours and you are ok with his. And just one who DOES have some traits you can't deal with (like eating too loud) but then all of a sudden you find that you CAN deal with it.
P.S. Was this brown sock man the dude you were telling me about when I was studying in the park?
i once dated a guy who wore glasses and high-waisted jeans and button-up shirts for every occasion.
no, it was not ed grimely, but some other incarnation of the same type of guy that is so-wierd-he's-intersting-at-first-but actually-too-weird-for-me.
i applaud you for not blowing off people just becasue they are "not your type" because that is BS.
no one has a type. everyday we turn into someone new, at least i do. i am 28 and still growing. it's mostly in-my-head-stuff, maturing and stuff, so that the next wierd guy i might be attracted to may very well wear docksiders and that is ok with me.
but i will not date a farter.
ps: the high-wasited-pant guy did in fact fart on me once and i dumped him shortly there after. i cannot say for sure whether the 2 incidences are connected.
And Lazlo should know, because she totally understands how one CANNOT dance to Madonna alone and simultaneously be a PREDATOR. (In this context "predator" is kind of a complicated word, but maybe you get the gist.)
There is something to be said for common courtesy. Maybe he was just born that way, maybe he was lactose intolerant Maybe he had irritable bowel syndrome which I have always filed under ,bogus diseases invented to sell drugs but if you've got a problem, you've got a problem. If he wasn't at least willing to get some new underwear I think that it is not unreasonable to give up on a stinking relationship.
Crap.
I was just going to preview that. If I'd previewed it I'd have noticed what a mess the punctuation was and fixed it. Sorry.
I took me several years and several relationships (with a panoply of men, including Never Removes Jeans [I think Dubin knows him pretty well, too] and Wears Socks With Tevas) to understand that even though certain guys thought I was shallow for not, say, appreciating the look of a poufy dress shirt shoved into a pair of Dockers, it was really an issue of TASTE, not depth. Taste is not necessarily a thing you take lightly, or shame yourself into denying, because it forms your aesthetic judgments about everything around you, not just docksiders. It turns out that Wears Socks With Tevas also wasn't a fan of ambient lighting, or neat piles of paperwork on one's desk, or arranging furniture so that it wasn't all jammed into corners. And these things really affect my mood and my ability to feel at peace in my environment. That's not shallow; that’s the serious business of comfort and taste. Sure, all relationships require compromise, but not at the expense of maintaining a pleasant emotional environment. I’m going to disagree and say that you shouldn’t adjust your own attitude; some things can’t be let go and you shouldn’t beat yourself up trying. Instead, cultivate things as you like them and eventually the right guy will stumble into your garden. (Sorry, I didn’t mean that to sound kind of nasty. And I even almost wrote “the right gopher will stumble into your garden.” Ew.)
First, I must say that I am REALLY enjoying reading your blog (which is bad since I'm at work), and that this bit made me crack up out loud. That being said, while I would say you'll never find a man who allows you to check all the boxes on your list, 7 years with the same man have taught me this: relationships have enough to endure over the course of time. Best then, to start out blinded by love, as they say, and totally over the moon instead of trying not to be repulsed by, oh...let's say, leg crossing. That way, when the shplit hits the fan, as it inevitably does, it doesn't tip the balance all out of whack. You'll still have that over the moon feeling to inspire you to hold on through the storm, etc.
Please be aware that in the North East it is normal to wear docksiders. It is also normal to wear dockers and button down shirts. In other words the L.L. Bean look is normal here. Now I assure you the flatulence does not come part and parcel with our preppy culture. Well, let me think on that... no, no it doesn't.
Post a Comment